Difference between revisions of "ISO5087-1:Agent"
Megankatsumi (talk | contribs) m (Megankatsumi moved page Iso5087-1:Agent to ISO5087-1:Agent: Text replacement - "Iso5087-1:Agent" to "ISO5087-1:Agent") |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Class Definition | {{Class Definition | ||
− | |Description=An Agent may be a Person or Organization. (We do not include Software or Mechanical Device at this time). | + | |Subclass Of=Prov:Agent |
+ | |Description=An Agent is a generic concept that may represent a person, software system, organization, or any other object that may be responsible for the occurrence of an activity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Agent: An Agent may be a Person or Organization. (We do not include Software or Mechanical Device at this time). An Agent has the following core properties: | ||
+ | * hasName: an identifier for the agent | ||
+ | * resourceOf: identifies what State the agent may be a resource of | ||
+ | * perform: identifies activities that the agent performs | ||
|Class Diagram Description=Figure 1 illustrates the use of the Agreement Ontology to represent agreements at different levels of detail. The example shown captures a complex, disjunctive agreement that can be decomposed into two simple agreements. One option (“agr0012”) describes “alice”’s right to have lawn maintenance be performed by “bob”, (also read “bob”’s duty to perform lawn maintenance for “alice”). | |Class Diagram Description=Figure 1 illustrates the use of the Agreement Ontology to represent agreements at different levels of detail. The example shown captures a complex, disjunctive agreement that can be decomposed into two simple agreements. One option (“agr0012”) describes “alice”’s right to have lawn maintenance be performed by “bob”, (also read “bob”’s duty to perform lawn maintenance for “alice”). | ||
|Definition Status=Pending Approval | |Definition Status=Pending Approval | ||
Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
|Property=Perform | |Property=Perform | ||
|Restriction=only | |Restriction=only | ||
− | |Value= | + | |Value=ISO5087-1:Activity |
+ | }}{{Manchester Row | ||
+ | |Property=HasClaim | ||
+ | |Restriction=only | ||
+ | |Value=5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement | ||
+ | }}{{Manchester Row | ||
+ | |Property=HasNoClaim | ||
+ | |Restriction=only | ||
+ | |Value=5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement | ||
+ | }}{{Manchester Row | ||
+ | |Property=HasDuty | ||
+ | |Restriction=only | ||
+ | |Value=5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement | ||
+ | }}{{Manchester Row | ||
+ | |Property=HasPrivilege | ||
+ | |Restriction=only | ||
+ | |Value=5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Supplementary Figures | {{Supplementary Figures | ||
|Figure Row={{Figure Row | |Figure Row={{Figure Row | ||
− | |Figure=Agree1.png | + | |Figure=Agree1.png |
|Caption=Figure 1: Example use of the Agreement Ontology. | |Caption=Figure 1: Example use of the Agreement Ontology. | ||
+ | }}{{Figure Row | ||
+ | |Figure=Prov1.png | ||
+ | |Caption=Figure 2: The Provenance Ontology main classes and properties | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 05:34, 16 December 2022
Pattern
This class has been associated with the following pattern:
Pattern:Agent Pattern, Pattern:Provenance Pattern
Subclass Of
Description
An English description of the definition (what distinguishes this sense of the term?).
An Agent is a generic concept that may represent a person, software system, organization, or any other object that may be responsible for the occurrence of an activity.
Agent: An Agent may be a Person or Organization. (We do not include Software or Mechanical Device at this time). An Agent has the following core properties:
- hasName: an identifier for the agent
- resourceOf: identifies what State the agent may be a resource of
- perform: identifies activities that the agent performs
Class Diagram Description
Figure 1 illustrates the use of the Agreement Ontology to represent agreements at different levels of detail. The example shown captures a complex, disjunctive agreement that can be decomposed into two simple agreements. One option (“agr0012”) describes “alice”’s right to have lawn maintenance be performed by “bob”, (also read “bob”’s duty to perform lawn maintenance for “alice”).
Required by Use Case(s)
(why is this specialized definition needed?)
Finding, Reserving, and Paying for Parking
CDM References
What other classes or properties reference this term?
- Organization (← links)
- Post (← links)
- ISO5087-1:Activity (← links)
- Entity (← links)
- Finding, Reserving, and Paying for Parking (← links)
- PersonID (← links)
- Agent (redirect page) (← links)
- 5087-1:Agent (redirect page) (← links)
- Iso5087-1:Agent (redirect page) (← links)
Interface Specification References
This class has been associated with the following interface specification items:
Sources
Sources considered when developing the class:
Status
Pending Approval
Has Subclass(es)
Annotations
Annotation | Value |
---|
Manchester Syntax Specification
Property | Restriction | Value |
---|---|---|
HasName | exactly 1 | xsd:string |
ResourceOf | only | resource:TerminalResourceState |
Perform | only | ISO5087-1:Activity |
HasClaim | only | 5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement |
HasNoClaim | only | 5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement |
HasDuty | only | 5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement |
HasPrivilege | only | 5087-1:ISO5087-1:AtomicAgreement |
Supplementary Figures
Figure | Caption |
---|---|
Figure 1: Example use of the Agreement Ontology. | |
Figure 2: The Provenance Ontology main classes and properties |